Amber Rudd Calls For WhatsApp Messages To Be Tapped After Terrorist Attack
The Debrief: Tapping into our WhatsApp messages: A breach of public privacy or the answer to preventing potential terror attacks?
Boasting over a billion users worldwide and with a reputation for protecting user privacy, WhatsApp is an app most of us use every day. But, could it be impeding public safety?
Following the terrorist attack last Wednesday in London, Amber Rudd has urged that intelligence services be allowed to access our WhatsApp messages, in order to help prevent further attacks.
Attacker Khalid Masood, who had already been convicted for violent crimes in the UK, is said to have used the messaging app just moments before he ploughed down members of the public on Westminster Bridge. It is therefore possible that the attack could have been averted if intelligence services had been able to track his messages, as well as gaining an insight into his potential motives.
In 2016, WhatsApp introduced “end-to-end” encryption, which is a techy way of saying that only you and your recipient can read your messages and any other source that may attempt to infiltrate, cannot. At the moment, not even intelligence services are exempt. WhatsApp say: “Not cybercriminals. Not hackers. Not oppressive regimes. Not even us.”
Liked this? You might also be interested in:
Follow Maeve on Twitter @maevieCampbell
At work? With your gran?
You might want to think about the fact you're about to read something that wouldn't exactly get a PG rating